Re: Floating-point timestamps versus Range Types

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Floating-point timestamps versus Range Types
Date: 2010-10-17 22:22:12
Message-ID: 1287354132.12624.1.camel@jd-desktop
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, 2010-10-17 at 16:27 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > The only major distribution that I know of that ships the deprecated
> > configuration is RedHat/Fedora. I don't know when that will change.
>
> Red Hat switched to integer datetimes as of 8.4 ... just like upstream.
> Please don't imagine that you can complain that Red Hat is behind the
> curve on that.

I wasn't imagining please don't get your boxers in a bunch. I was
misinformed and I apologize.

JD

>
> regards, tom lane
>

--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
http://twitter.com/cmdpromptinc | http://identi.ca/commandprompt

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2010-10-17 22:50:34 Re: WIP: extensible enums
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2010-10-17 21:39:38 Re: WIP: extensible enums