Re: Git conversion status

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Git conversion status
Date: 2010-09-20 19:20:26
Message-ID: 1285010426.20510.38.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On mån, 2010-09-20 at 15:09 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wouldn't be against that necessarily if we were
> keeping the keywords and not getting rid of them. But since we are
> going to get rid of them going forward, I think what we want this
> conversion to do is match what's in the historical tarballs.

Stupid question: Why don't you get rid of the key words beforehand?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stefan Kaltenbrunner 2010-09-20 19:24:33 Re: Git conversion status
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-09-20 19:09:18 Re: Git conversion status