Re: Version Numbering

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Version Numbering
Date: 2010-08-21 02:44:18
Message-ID: 1282358658.9325.24.camel@jd-desktop.unknown.charter.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, 2010-08-21 at 01:36 +0000, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: RIPEMD160
>
>
> > Look at other DBMSes:
> > Oracle: 8i, 9i, 10g, 11g
> > Informix 9, 10, 11
> > MS SQL Server 7, 2000, 2005, 2008
>
> > is not only confusing but make people think we are somehow behind the
> > others... someone actually told me that Oracle is in version 11 we
> > only in version 8 so Oracle should have more features...
> > no that i follow that reasoning but...
>
> Well by that reasoning SQL Server 2008 is a quantum leap ahead of Oracle!

Do we really want to have that argument :P

JD
--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
http://twitter.com/cmdpromptinc | http://identi.ca/commandprompt

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David E. Wheeler 2010-08-21 02:48:02 Re: Version Numbering
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2010-08-21 02:43:58 Re: Version Numbering