Re: including backend ID in relpath of temp rels - updated patch

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: Joshua D(dot) Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: including backend ID in relpath of temp rels - updated patch
Date: 2010-08-12 17:22:56
Message-ID: 1281633721-sup-3994@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Excerpts from David Fetter's message of jue ago 12 12:59:33 -0400 2010:
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 09:53:54AM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:

> > I was under the impression that the project guideline was that we
> > only accepted context diffs?
>
> Since they're trivially producible from unified diffs, this is a
> pretty silly reason to bounce--or even comment on--patches. It's less
> a guideline than a personal preference, namely Tom's.

Not that I review that many patches, but I do dislike unified diffs too.

--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-08-12 17:29:57 Re: including backend ID in relpath of temp rels - updated patch
Previous Message David Fetter 2010-08-12 16:59:33 Re: including backend ID in relpath of temp rels - updated patch