Re: Re: [HACKERS] ECPG dynamic cursor fix for UPDATE/DELETE ... WHERE CURRENT OF :curname

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Michael Meskes <michael(at)fam-meskes(dot)de>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <kevin(dot)grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: [HACKERS] ECPG dynamic cursor fix for UPDATE/DELETE ... WHERE CURRENT OF :curname
Date: 2010-08-05 15:55:34
Message-ID: 1281023697-sup-8255@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Excerpts from Michael Meskes's message of jue ago 05 05:39:46 -0400 2010:
> Sorry I thought Zoltan's explanation was clear enough. All prior ECPG versions were fine because dynamic cursor names were only added in 9.0. Apparently only this one place was missed. So this is a bug in the new feature, however not such a major one that it warrants the complete removal IMO. I'd prefer to fix this in 9.0.1.

Since we're still in the beta phase, it makes sense to apply the fix
right now so that it appears in 9.0. No point in waiting for 9.0.1.

--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-08-05 15:57:27 Re: Concurrent MERGE
Previous Message Richard 2010-08-05 15:50:09 Re: Re: [HACKERS] Online backup cause boot failure, anyone know why?