Re: Explicit psqlrc

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: David Christensen <david(at)endpoint(dot)com>, gabrielle <gorthx(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Mark Wong <markwkm(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Explicit psqlrc
Date: 2010-07-21 14:24:26
Message-ID: 1279722266.22506.0.camel@fsopti579.F-Secure.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On tis, 2010-07-20 at 11:48 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> It's tempting to propose making .psqlrc apply only in interactive
> mode, period. But that would be an incompatibility with previous
> releases, and I'm not sure it's the behavior we want, either.

What is a use case for having .psqlrc be read in noninteractive use?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-07-21 14:42:56 Re: Explicit psqlrc
Previous Message Leonardo Francalanci 2010-07-21 14:15:55 Re: I: About "Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal" patch