Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT
Date: 2014-02-04 15:43:28
Message-ID: 12787.1391528608@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 2014-02-04 02:10:47 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Meh. It might be that the DateStyle usage in postgres_fdw would
>> accidentally fail to malfunction if it saw a bogus value of the variable.
>> But it's hard to believe that this would be true of MainLWLockArray.

> There's not that much lwlock usage in contrib. It's just
> pg_stat_statements and pg_buffercache. Neither has tests... So it very
> well could be that breakage simply hasn't been observed.

Hm, you're right --- I'd have thought there were more of those.

Ugh. This problem was bad enough when I thought that it would only lead
to link-time errors detectable in the buildfarm. If it can lead to errors
only observable at runtime --- and maybe not obvious even then --- then
I think we *have to* do something about it. By that I mean that we must
get rid of the need to manually plaster PGDLLIMPORT on global variables.

Anybody with a Windows build environment want to test the "#define extern"
trick?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2014-02-04 16:06:52 Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT
Previous Message Tom Lane 2014-02-04 15:31:03 Re: could not create IPv6 socket (AI_ADDRCONFIG)