| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: warning message in standby |
| Date: | 2010-06-14 14:56:38 |
| Message-ID: | 1276527398.23257.52164.camel@ebony |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2010-06-14 at 10:30 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I'm totally unimpressed by the argument that log-filtering
> applications don't know enough to pay attention to LOG messages.
> There are already a lot of those that are quite important to notice.
We have a log level where 1 log entry in a million is something serious
and all the rest are generally ignorable. That situation leads to the
cognitive phenomena is known as "normalization of deviance", a term
coined in the wake of the Challenger disaster.
Should I be downgrading Hot Standby breakages to LOG? That will
certainly help high availability as well.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-06-14 14:57:08 | Re: warning message in standby |
| Previous Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2010-06-14 14:55:44 | Re: Typo in plperl doc ? |