Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful)

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful)
Date: 2010-05-17 11:38:28
Message-ID: 1274096308.28911.638.camel@ebony
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 07:33 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> I would
> prefer that we focus on the technical issues here rather than who
> wrote the patch.

There are three patches now from 2 authors. I agree we should focus on
the technical issues, but which issues, in which patch? If Masao had
accepted your version he would not have written another, would he?

--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2010-05-17 11:44:16 Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful)
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-05-17 11:33:05 Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful)