Re: generic pseudotype IO functions?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: generic pseudotype IO functions?
Date: 2014-01-07 15:04:33
Message-ID: 12739.1389107073@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> I think we also should auto-assign the oids for pg_proc (and some other
> tables) rows if we go there.

-1 ... you've evidently not built any opclasses lately.

Yeah, we could probably improve the bootstrap infrastructure enough to not
need literal OIDs in so many places in the initial catalog contents, but
it'd be lots of trouble. It definitely is *not* something to buy into at
the same time as redoing the creation of the .bki file.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christoph Berg 2014-01-07 15:09:44 extra_float_digits and casting from real to numeric
Previous Message MauMau 2014-01-07 13:56:28 Re: [bug fix] multibyte messages are displayed incorrectly on the client