| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: change in LOCK behavior |
| Date: | 2012-11-26 16:11:48 |
| Message-ID: | 12732.1353946308@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> We have to do something about this one way or another before we can ship
>> 9.2.2. Is the consensus to revert this patch:
>> http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=d573e239f03506920938bf0be56c868d9c3416da
>> and if so, who's going to do the deed?
> I was assuming you were going to do it.
OK, will take care of it.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2012-11-26 16:13:56 | Re: Further pg_upgrade analysis for many tables |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2012-11-26 16:05:47 | Re: Duplicated oids between tables - problem or not? |