| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, David Christensen <david(at)endpoint(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Explicit psqlrc |
| Date: | 2010-03-08 20:59:03 |
| Message-ID: | 1268081943.10620.35.camel@ebony |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, 2010-03-07 at 16:37 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> With your interleave, you mean things like "psql -f first.sql -f - -f
> second.sql"? That does sound like it could be handy - and also really
> dangerous :-)
Multiple -f support would be a good thing.
As would mixed -f and -c options.
What would be even better would be bringing across many of the concepts
that are in pgbench, which has had the multiple file support for some
time.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2010-03-08 21:11:09 | Re: SQL compatibility reminder: MySQL vs PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2010-03-08 20:58:59 | Re: SQL compatibility reminder: MySQL vs PostgreSQL |