Re: Hot Standby and handling max_standby_delay

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Hot Standby and handling max_standby_delay
Date: 2010-01-18 09:30:29
Message-ID: 1263807029.3642.1689.camel@ebony
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 2010-01-18 at 08:28 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:

> > Do we need a new record type for that, is there a handy record type to
> > bounce from?
>
> After starting streaming, slices of WAL are sent as CopyData messages.
> The CopyData payload begins with an XLogRecPtr, followed by the WAL
> data. That payload format needs to be extended with a 'message type'
> field and a new message type for the timestamps need to be added.

It wouldn't be a good use of all of our time for me to work on this. I
have zero unallocated time remaining and you'd still need to review what
I'd written, in any case.

--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2010-01-18 09:30:36 Re: Streaming Replication on win32
Previous Message Leonardo F 2010-01-18 09:13:14 Re: Review: Patch: Allow substring/replace() to get/set bit values