Re: Exclusion Constraint vs. Constraint Exclusion

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Exclusion Constraint vs. Constraint Exclusion
Date: 2009-12-08 02:23:24
Message-ID: 1260239004.25892.42.camel@monkey-cat.sm.truviso.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 23:12 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Perhaps
> table_exclusion = {on, off, partition}

Sounds good to me.

> Of course, constraint_exclusion should continue to work as a synonym for
> backwards compatibility, but it wouldn't be documented.

+1.

Regards,
Jeff Davis

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2009-12-08 02:25:44 Re: Exclusion Constraint vs. Constraint Exclusion
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2009-12-08 02:12:01 Re: Exclusion Constraint vs. Constraint Exclusion