Re: Block-level CRC checks

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, decibel <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Block-level CRC checks
Date: 2009-12-04 15:55:38
Message-ID: 1259942138.13774.38504.camel@ebony
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 13:35 +0000, Greg Stark wrote:

> I don't think getting rid of infomask2 wins us 2 bytes so fast. The
> rest of those two bytes is natts which of course we still need.

err, yes, OK.

--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-12-04 16:01:42 Re: First feature patch for plperl - draft [PATCH]
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-12-04 15:54:10 Re: Block-level CRC checks