Re: Python 3.1 support

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: James Pye <lists(at)jwp(dot)name>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Python 3.1 support
Date: 2009-11-20 07:02:43
Message-ID: 1258700563.28720.1.camel@fsopti579.F-Secure.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On tor, 2009-11-19 at 13:12 -0700, James Pye wrote:
> > I think of a PL/Python function as a Python script file stored
> > in the database.
>
> For Python, I think that's a mistake. Python scripts are independent applications.

Is there any precedent for the sort of behavior that you are
implementing, that is, automatic sharing of variables between
independent executions of the same source container?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2009-11-20 07:05:41 Re: enable-thread-safety defaults?
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2009-11-20 06:55:53 Re: Summary and Plan for Hot Standby