Re: Python 3.1 support

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: James Pye <lists(at)jwp(dot)name>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Python 3.1 support
Date: 2009-11-15 13:37:17
Message-ID: 1258292237.14314.23.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On fre, 2009-11-13 at 11:27 -0700, James Pye wrote:
> Some are TODOs, so in part by other people. Some were briefly touched
> on in the recent past discussions(around the time that I announced the
> WIP). Native typing vs conversion, function fragments vs function
> modules.

I'm of course only one user, but these two features don't excite me at
all, and certainly not enough to go through the pain of dealing with a
second implementation.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2009-11-15 13:54:22 pgsql: /home/peter/commit-msg
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2009-11-15 12:43:02 Re: Hot standby, race condition between recovery snapshot and commit