Re: operator exclusion constraints

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: operator exclusion constraints
Date: 2009-11-02 17:46:16
Message-ID: 1257183976.27737.480.camel@jdavis
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 08:25 +0000, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I think the word CHECK should be avoided completely in this syntax, to
> avoid confusion with CHECK constraints.

This is an easy change. I don't have a strong opinion, so the only thing
I can think to do is ask for a vote.

Do you have a specific alternative in mind? How about just "WITH"?

Regards,
Jeff Davis

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-11-02 17:54:32 Renaming conversion procs (was Re: Error on compile for Windows)
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2009-11-02 17:44:23 Re: operator exclusion constraints