Re: Issues for named/mixed function notation patch

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Issues for named/mixed function notation patch
Date: 2009-10-07 21:49:44
Message-ID: 1254952184.16369.40.camel@monkey-cat.sm.truviso.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 23:32 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> It's same as my origin ideas, much better formulated. It is ok for me.

You indicated that there may be some implementation difficulty if the
VARIADIC keyword is required for calling using named notation:

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-09/msg01792.php

Do you think it would be reasonable to implement?

Regards,
Jeff Davis

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brendan Jurd 2009-10-07 21:57:40 Re: Triggers on columns
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-10-07 21:45:55 Re: Issues for named/mixed function notation patch