Re: Rules: A Modest Proposal

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Dan Colish <dan(at)unencrypted(dot)org>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Rules: A Modest Proposal
Date: 2009-10-05 06:50:18
Message-ID: 1254725418.25576.1.camel@fsopti579.F-Secure.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, 2009-10-04 at 18:24 -0700, Dan Colish wrote:
> I am not sure where that view implemenation is, but I doubt its
> stalled because of the rule system.

It is.

> You can definitely create updatable views using rules.

Sure you can, but they won't work in various significant corner cases.

Search the archives for "updatable views" for details.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2009-10-05 06:51:29 Re: Rules: A Modest Proposal
Previous Message Jeff Janes 2009-10-05 06:05:01 Re: Making hash indexes worthwhile