Re: Privileges and inheritance

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Privileges and inheritance
Date: 2009-10-04 19:57:30
Message-ID: 1254686250.13655.7.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, 2009-10-04 at 11:56 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Except ... I can imagine a multi-tenant setup where certain ROLEs only
> have permissions on some child relations, but not others. So we'd want
> to still enable a permissions check on a child when the child is called
> directly rather than through the parent.

Well, when you access the child, it doesn't care whether it has a
parent. So this is equivalent to checking permissions before accessing
a table, period. I think we'll keep that. ;-)

> And we'd want to hammer this to death looking for ways it can be a
> security exploit. Like, could you make a table into the parent of an
> existing table you didn't have permissions on?

I don't think so, but you're free to hammer. ;-)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2009-10-04 20:07:40 Re: Rules: A Modest Proposal
Previous Message David Fetter 2009-10-04 19:34:08 Re: Rules: A Modest Proposal