Re: Extensions vs PGXS' MODULE_PATHNAME handling

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Extensions vs PGXS' MODULE_PATHNAME handling
Date: 2011-02-14 00:46:48
Message-ID: 12535.1297644408@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"David E. Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> writes:
> I sure would like it if the install script with no version in it corresponded to the latest version. Otherwise, one must rename the file every time one does a release. And as you're noting, you lose Git history that way.

(1) git does know it's a rename, it's just not default for git diff to
show it that way.

(2) I think that the normal use-case would not involve removing the old
file, so this is moot anyhow.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David E. Wheeler 2011-02-14 00:49:31 Re: Extensions vs PGXS' MODULE_PATHNAME handling
Previous Message David E. Wheeler 2011-02-14 00:42:41 Re: Extensions vs PGXS' MODULE_PATHNAME handling