| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: New trigger option of pg_standby |
| Date: | 2009-05-27 18:24:23 |
| Message-ID: | 1243448663.24860.326.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 17:39 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> I agree we could've should've handled this more promptly, and I'll take
> my part of the blame for that. I let the various proposed patches sit
> for long times before reviewing them thoroughly, partly because I was
> busy and partly because I didn't feel good about the proposed
> approaches. I think what went in in the end is pretty simple and robust,
> but it's a shame we had to rush to get it into beta2, after sitting on
> our thumbs for months.
Through everything I just said, I have no criticism of you Heikki. I had
the same emotions about the proposals. I was only explaining why I felt
unable to speed up the process myself.
Final patch took me an hour to code and test, so I wasn't put out or
rushed.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2009-05-27 18:34:00 | Re: Serializable Isolation without blocking |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2009-05-27 18:08:52 | Re: New trigger option of pg_standby |