Re: Any better plan for this query?..

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Matthew Wakeling <matthew(at)flymine(dot)org>
Cc: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Dimitri <dimitrik(dot)fr(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Any better plan for this query?..
Date: 2009-05-12 15:04:48
Message-ID: 1242140688.3843.270.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance


On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 16:00 +0100, Matthew Wakeling wrote:
> won't connect operations be all handled by a
> single thread - the parent postmaster?

No, we spawn then authenticate.

--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matthew Wakeling 2009-05-12 15:05:37 Re: Any better plan for this query?..
Previous Message Matthew Wakeling 2009-05-12 15:00:00 Re: Any better plan for this query?..