Re: Replacing plpgsql's lexer

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Replacing plpgsql's lexer
Date: 2009-04-15 15:53:37
Message-ID: 1239810817.7840.235.camel@jd-laptop.pragmaticzealot.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 2009-04-15 at 11:45 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> > We support back branches for a long time for a reason.
>
> I think that's really the bottom line here. If we insist on new major
> releases always being bug-compatible with prior releases, our ability to
> improve the software will go to zero. The solution we have opted for
> instead is to support back branches for a long time and to avoid making
> that type of change in a back branch.
>

+1

Joshua D. Drake

> regards, tom lane
>
--
PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdrake(at)jabber(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Consulting, Development, Support, Training
503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2009-04-15 16:11:12 Re: Unicode string literals versus the world
Previous Message David E. Wheeler 2009-04-15 15:46:41 Re: Unicode string literals versus the world