Re: [GENERAL] trouble with pg_upgrade 9.0 -> 9.1

From: Groshev Andrey <greenx(at)yandex(dot)ru>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] trouble with pg_upgrade 9.0 -> 9.1
Date: 2012-12-20 05:30:40
Message-ID: 1236831355981440@web8h.yandex.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

No, people can confuse writing, but it makes a computer.
Unfortunately, I have not found developer this database, but I understand the logic was:
plob - primary key (lob ~ BLOB)
rlob - reference key (lob ~ BLOB)
Maybe if I describe the task, this part of the database, the problem is clear.
We need to maintain external documents (binary scans, per page).
Therefore, there is a table to store the titles and a table to store binary data.
To make it more comfortable I replaced all Russian words translated words.

This a table for headers store.

-- Table: "VersionOfTheExternalDocument$Document"
-- DROP TABLE "VersionOfTheExternalDocument$Document";

CREATE TABLE "VersionOfTheExternalDocument$Document"
(
"@File" integer NOT NULL DEFAULT nextval((pg_get_serial_sequence('"public"."VersionOfTheExternalDocument$Document"'::text, '@File'::text))::regclass),
"GUID" uuid,
"DataTime" timestamp without time zone DEFAULT (now())::timestamp without time zone,
"Name" character varying,
"Size" integer,
CONSTRAINT "VersionOfTheExternalDocument$Document_pkey" PRIMARY KEY ("@File")
)
WITH (
OIDS=FALSE
);
ALTER TABLE "VersionOfTheExternalDocument$Document"
OWNER TO postgres;
GRANT ALL ON TABLE "VersionOfTheExternalDocument$Document" TO postgres;
GRANT SELECT ON TABLE "VersionOfTheExternalDocument$Document" TO view_user;

-- Index: "iVersionOfTheExternalDocument$Document-blb_header"
-- DROP INDEX "iVersionOfTheExternalDocument$Document-blb_header";

CREATE INDEX "iVersionOfTheExternalDocument$Document-blb_header"
ON "VersionOfTheExternalDocument$Document"
USING btree
("GUID", "@Файл", "ДатаВремя")
WHERE "GUID" IS NOT NULL;
---------------------------------------------------------------
And this for data.

-- Table: "lob.VersionOfTheExternalDocument$Document"
-- DROP TABLE "lob.VersionOfTheExternalDocument$Document";
CREATE TABLE "lob.VersionOfTheExternalDocument$Document"
(
"@File" integer NOT NULL,
"Page" integer NOT NULL,
"Data" bytea,
CONSTRAINT "lob.VersionOfTheExternalDocument$Document_pkey" PRIMARY KEY ("@File", "Page"),
CONSTRAINT "rlob(dot)VersionOfTheExternalDocument$Document-(at)File" FOREIGN KEY ("@File")
REFERENCES "VersionOfTheExternalDocument$Document" ("@File") MATCH SIMPLE
ON UPDATE CASCADE ON DELETE CASCADE DEFERRABLE INITIALLY IMMEDIATE
)
WITH (
OIDS=FALSE
);
ALTER TABLE "lob.VersionOfTheExternalDocument$Document"
OWNER TO postgres;
GRANT ALL ON TABLE "lob.VersionOfTheExternalDocument$Document" TO postgres;
GRANT SELECT ON TABLE "lob.VersionOfTheExternalDocument$Document" TO view_user;

20.12.2012, 07:12, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 10:35:11PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
>>>  There is another table "ВерсияВнешнегоДокумента$Документ" (without ^lob.)
>>>  It is referenced by a foreign key ("rlob(dot)ВерсияВнешнегоДокумента$Документ-(at)Файл")
>>>  But as I understand it, the problem with the primary key.
>>  Does the old database have a table with prefix "plob.", called
>>  plob.ВерсияВнешнегоДокумента$Документ?
>>
>>  If not, if you do pg_dumpall --schema-only --binary-upgrade, is there a
>>  table with that name mentioned?
>
> Also, when you say "rlob" above, is the 'r' a Latin letter sound that
> would look like a Russian 'p' in the error message?  (In Cyrillic, a
> Latin-looking p sounds like Latin-sounding r.)
>
> --
>   Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>        http://momjian.us
>   EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com
>
>   + It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Kesten 2012-12-20 06:42:43 Re: How to startup the database server?
Previous Message Groshev Andrey 2012-12-20 04:55:16 Re: [GENERAL] trouble with pg_upgrade 9.0 -> 9.1

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Groshev Andrey 2012-12-20 05:34:44 Re: [GENERAL] trouble with pg_upgrade 9.0 -> 9.1
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2012-12-20 05:22:10 Re: Set visibility map bit after HOT prune