Re: One less footgun: deprecating pg_dump -d

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)endpoint(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: One less footgun: deprecating pg_dump -d
Date: 2009-03-09 18:13:34
Message-ID: 1236622414.4649.37.camel@jd-laptop.pragmaticzealot.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 13:30 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > Sorry Tom. Greg is correct here although I disagree with his wording. It
> > should be removed and if someone passes -d it should throw an ERROR that
> > says something like:
> > ERROR: -d has been replaced by -I
>
> Well, if you want to break it, we can debate about the wisdom of that.
> But please don't describe the patch in such a misleading way as the
> current thread title.

That's fair.

Joshua D. Drake

>
> regards, tom lane
>
--
PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdrake(at)jabber(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Consulting, Development, Support, Training
503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2009-03-09 18:14:40 Re: Prepping to break every past release...
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2009-03-09 17:59:48 Re: Prepping to break every past release...