Re: pg_dump versus views and opclasses

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Brendan Jurd" <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_dump versus views and opclasses
Date: 2009-01-17 15:52:49
Message-ID: 12321.1232207569@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Brendan Jurd" <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Update. Turns out that 8.4 DOES know how to execute the view. If you
> try to group on a user-defined composite type, 8.4 just goes ahead and
> groups it, rather than giving the old "could not identify an ordering
> operator" error.

Is there a hash opclass for the type? 8.4 can group types that have
hash but not btree opclasses, but prior versions insisted on btree.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brendan Jurd 2009-01-17 15:56:34 Re: pg_dump versus views and opclasses
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-01-17 15:49:54 Re: Autovacuum daemon terminated by signal 11