From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Gregory Smith <gregsmithpgsql(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)dalibo(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: four minor proposals for 9.5 |
Date: | 2014-04-14 13:53:00 |
Message-ID: | 12317.1397483580@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> 2014-04-14 14:57 GMT+02:00 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>> I agree. I don't think the idea of pushing this into the
>> log_line_prefix stuff as a one-off is a very good one. Sure, we could
>> wedge it in there, but we've got an existing precedent that everything
>> that you can get with log_line_prefix also shows up in the CSV output
>> file. And it's easy to imagine LOTS more counters that somebody might
>> want to have.
I think this argument is sufficient to kill this line of proposal
entirely.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2014-04-14 14:13:49 | Re: Patch: add psql tab completion for event triggers |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2014-04-14 13:31:56 | Re: four minor proposals for 9.5 |