Re: four minor proposals for 9.5

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Gregory Smith <gregsmithpgsql(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)dalibo(dot)com>
Subject: Re: four minor proposals for 9.5
Date: 2014-04-14 13:53:00
Message-ID: 12317.1397483580@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> 2014-04-14 14:57 GMT+02:00 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>> I agree. I don't think the idea of pushing this into the
>> log_line_prefix stuff as a one-off is a very good one. Sure, we could
>> wedge it in there, but we've got an existing precedent that everything
>> that you can get with log_line_prefix also shows up in the CSV output
>> file. And it's easy to imagine LOTS more counters that somebody might
>> want to have.

I think this argument is sufficient to kill this line of proposal
entirely.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2014-04-14 14:13:49 Re: Patch: add psql tab completion for event triggers
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2014-04-14 13:31:56 Re: four minor proposals for 9.5