Re: Preventing index scans for non-recoverable index AMs

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Kenneth Marshall <ktm(at)rice(dot)edu>
Cc: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Preventing index scans for non-recoverable index AMs
Date: 2008-12-17 22:58:11
Message-ID: 1229554691.4793.141.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 16:47 -0600, Kenneth Marshall wrote:

> I think having your index survive a server power outage or other
> crash is a very good thing. Rebuilding a hash index for the case
> for which it is preferred (large, large tables) would be excrutiating.

Completely agree.

We may be outta time to make it happen.

--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jaime Casanova 2008-12-17 23:01:55 Re: Preventing index scans for non-recoverable index AMs
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2008-12-17 22:54:28 Re: Preventing index scans for non-recoverable index AMs