Re: Simple postgresql.conf wizard

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Simple postgresql.conf wizard
Date: 2008-12-05 03:29:24
Message-ID: 1228447764.4794.2.camel@jd-laptop.pragmaticzealot.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 21:51 -0500, Greg Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Dec 2008, Robert Haas wrote:
>
> > Just let's please change it both places, rather than letting
> > contrib/pgtune be a backdoor to get around not liking what initdb does.
> > And similarly with the other parameters...
>
> Someone running pgtune has specifically asked for their database to be
> tuned for performance; someone running initdb has not. It's not a
> backdoor,

Right.

> the defaults for a tuned small system and what comes out of
> initdb have completely different priorities.

IMO the priority of initdb is, "Get the damn thing running"

> The linking of the two that
> keeps happening in this thread makes no sense to me, and frankly I
> consider the whole topic an off-topic distraction.
>

Agreed.

Joshua D. Drake

--
PostgreSQL
Consulting, Development, Support, Training
503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message KaiGai Kohei 2008-12-05 03:33:21 Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1268)
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2008-12-05 03:09:42 Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code