Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches
Date: 2005-09-12 03:20:41
Message-ID: 12266.1126495241@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> * Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
>> Er, which (or both) of the two patches did you apply here?

> Applied both, sorry that wasn't clear.

Thanks. If you've got the time, could you try the two patches
separately and see what you get?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2005-09-12 03:37:06 Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2005-09-12 03:17:51 Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches