Re: pg_dump(all) --quote-all-identifiers

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Hartmut Goebel <h(dot)goebel(at)goebel-consult(dot)de>
Subject: Re: pg_dump(all) --quote-all-identifiers
Date: 2010-06-14 14:05:44
Message-ID: 12186.1276524344@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 6:57 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>> Uh, I thought this was about quoting the identifiers. I am confused
>> about why "integer" is an issue in this case. Can you show an example?

> Sure.

INTEGER is actually a keyword in this context, not an identifier.
(Remember the actual name of the type is int4, not integer.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-06-14 14:08:31 Re: warning message in standby
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-06-14 13:13:29 Re: Proposal for 9.1: WAL streaming from WAL buffers