Re: Invocation overhead for procedural languages

From: Ragnar <gnari(at)hive(dot)is>
To: Giorgio Valoti <giorgio_v(at)mac(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Invocation overhead for procedural languages
Date: 2008-08-06 22:26:56
Message-ID: 1218061616.10575.5.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


On mið, 2008-08-06 at 20:48 +0200, Giorgio Valoti wrote:
> On 06/ago/08, at 16:04, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>
> >
> > it's depend. Start of interpret is only one overhead.
> > Other is date
> > conversions to language compatible types (without C and plpgsql).

> So is plpgsql slower on date conversion than other languages? Just
> curious: why does shared evaluation add some overhead?
>

I am sure he meant "data" conversion , not "date"

gnari

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John DeSoi 2008-08-07 00:25:08 Re: looking for psql without server-installation
Previous Message Chirag Dave 2008-08-06 20:53:26 lossing pg_stat's data