Re: Forcing current WAL file to be archived

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Forcing current WAL file to be archived
Date: 2006-08-14 02:50:14
Message-ID: 12179.1155523814@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> This issue is closed, right?

We've agreed we need two functions, but it's not done yet. Seems pretty
trivial though ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-08-14 02:52:26 Re: [HACKERS] Forcing current WAL file to be archived
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-08-14 02:43:50 Re: Forcing current WAL file to be archived

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-08-14 02:52:26 Re: [HACKERS] Forcing current WAL file to be archived
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-08-14 02:43:50 Re: Forcing current WAL file to be archived