Re: patch for new feature: Buffer Cache Hibernation

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Mitsuru IWASAKI <iwasaki(at)jp(dot)FreeBSD(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: patch for new feature: Buffer Cache Hibernation
Date: 2011-05-04 15:44:36
Message-ID: 12145.1304523876@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Mitsuru IWASAKI <iwasaki(at)jp(dot)FreeBSD(dot)org> writes:
> Postgres usually starts with ZERO buffer cache. By saving the buffer
> cache data structure into hibernation files just before shutdown, and
> loading them at startup, postgres can start operations with the saved
> buffer cache as the same condition as just before the last shutdown.

This seems like a lot of complication for rather dubious gain. What
happens when the DBA changes the shared_buffers setting, for instance?
How do you protect against the cached buffers getting out-of-sync with
the actual disk files (especially during recovery scenarios)? What
about crash-induced corruption in the cache file itself (consider the
not-unlikely possibility that init will kill the database before it's
had time to dump all the buffers during a system shutdown)? Do you have
any proof that writing out a few GB of buffers and then reading them
back in is actually much cheaper than letting the database re-read the
data from the disk files?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2011-05-04 15:51:57 Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory
Previous Message Greg Stark 2011-05-04 15:38:50 Re: patch for new feature: Buffer Cache Hibernation