Re: Partitioned table limitation

From: Goboxe <hadzramin(dot)ar(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Partitioned table limitation
Date: 2007-10-02 00:28:46
Message-ID: 1191284926.905585.187280@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

>
> I've played around with as many as 1,000 child tables. By then, the
> planning time becomes noticeably longer than for a single table, but
> the response time is still so much faster that it's worth it. Note
> I'm talking only a fraction of a second planning time, even at 1,000
> tables.
>
> If you are going over 100 tables, make sure you're using triggers for
> updating the child tables not rules, as rules are far too slow when
> there's over 50 or so tables to look choose from.
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
> choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
> match- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Scott,

Could you share a snippet on how to use trigger for this?

TQ,
G

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jason L. Buberel 2007-10-02 05:32:14 Re: Strange discrepancy in query performance...
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-10-02 00:01:42 Re: Strange discrepancy in query performance...