| From: | Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)CommandPrompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)CommandPrompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Bugtraq: Having Fun With PostgreSQL |
| Date: | 2007-06-18 09:22:27 |
| Message-ID: | 1182158547.4592.7.camel@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 01:58 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Practically every existing packaging of PG tries to run initdb as a
> hidden, behind-the-scenes, definitely not-interactive procedure.
Also, from RPM perspective: RPMs are *not* interactive, and will *never*
be. So we cannot ask user a password during initdb, or such.
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, ODBCng - http://www.commandprompt.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2007-06-18 10:27:23 | Re: Bugtraq: Having Fun With PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2007-06-18 08:53:28 | Re: EXPLAIN omits schema? |