Re: Auto creation of Partitions

From: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>
To: Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>
Cc: Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>, NikhilS <nikkhils(at)gmail(dot)com>, Shane Ambler <pgsql(at)sheeky(dot)biz>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Auto creation of Partitions
Date: 2007-03-09 22:16:20
Message-ID: 1173478581.3243.1.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Ühel kenal päeval, R, 2007-03-09 kell 15:41, kirjutas Jim Nasby:
> On Mar 9, 2007, at 3:31 AM, Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD wrote:
> >>> Since partition is inheritance-based, a simple DROP or "NO
> >> INHERIT"
> >>> will do the job to deal with the partition. Do we want to reinvent
> >>> additional syntax when these are around and are documented?
> >>
> >> Well, if the syntax for adding a new partition eventually
> >> ends up as ALTER TABLE ADD PARTITION, then it would make more
> >> sense that you remove a partition via ALTER TABLE DROP PARTITION.
> >
> > But DROP PARTITION usually moves the data from this partition to other
> > partitions,
> > so it is something different.
>
> It does? IIRC every partitioning system I've seen DROP PARTITION
> drops the data as well. It's up to you to move it somewhere else if
> you want to keep it.

Will this proposed DROP PARTITION just disassociate the table from the
master, or will it actually drop the partitions table from the whole
database ?

--
----------------
Hannu Krosing
Database Architect
Skype Technologies OÜ
Akadeemia tee 21 F, Tallinn, 12618, Estonia

Skype me: callto:hkrosing
Get Skype for free: http://www.skype.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2007-03-09 22:27:28 Re: Bug in VACUUM FULL ?
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2007-03-09 22:06:07 Re: scan_recycle_buffers

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-03-09 23:05:38 Re: scan_recycle_buffers
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2007-03-09 22:06:07 Re: scan_recycle_buffers