Re: New features for pgbench

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: New features for pgbench
Date: 2007-02-12 04:20:15
Message-ID: 1171254015.5454.212.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

On Sun, 2007-02-11 at 23:12 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> No, it isn't. This is *not* a candidate for back-porting.

Why is that? It seems to me that the potential downside is essentially
zero. This is a developer-oriented benchmark tool, after all.

-Neil

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-02-12 04:29:18 Re: New features for pgbench
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-02-12 04:12:21 Re: New features for pgbench