Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-patches] Phantom CommandIDs,updated patch

From: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-patches] Phantom CommandIDs,updated patch
Date: 2007-02-09 03:11:18
Message-ID: 1170990678.22638.23.camel@silverbirch.site
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 00:08 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 15:32 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > > > Tom Lane wrote:
> > > >> Packed doesn't seem to have quite the right connotation either --- it
> > > >> sounds like it means there are two separable fields in the CID value.
> > > >>
> > > >> Maybe "composite cid"?
> > >
> > > > At one point I was thinking "combo". but "composite" sounds good.
> >
> > Combo is OK, because it's a *combination* of two CommandIds.
> >
> > That means they are ComboCommandIds or CCIs.
>
> CCI is CommandCounterIncrement to me, so let's not use that
> abbreviation.

True; given the similar context that would be a mistake.

Just ComboIds then? I was worried that was cid also.

--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-02-09 03:15:26 Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-patches] Phantom Command IDs,updated patch
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2007-02-09 03:08:24 Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-patches] Phantom Command IDs,updated patch

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-02-09 03:15:26 Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-patches] Phantom Command IDs,updated patch
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2007-02-09 03:08:24 Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-patches] Phantom Command IDs,updated patch