Re: TODO items for removal

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: TODO items for removal
Date: 2007-01-13 15:33:36
Message-ID: 1168702416.6174.20.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 2007-01-12 at 22:24 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> This item was rejected by Tom, since a workaround exists
>
> Add estimated_count(*) to return an estimate of COUNT(*)
> This would use the planner ANALYZE statistics to return an estimated
> count. http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-11/msg00943.php

ISTM Tom didn't reject the TODO item (or the basic feature idea it
describes), he just objected to the syntax -- which I can understand,
count(*) is not syntax we want to be copying. AFAIK no one has actually
implemented the UDF he describes, though, so there should still be a
TODO item.

-Neil

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-01-13 16:54:29 Re: Corrupt database? 8.1/FreeBSD6.0
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-01-13 15:13:47 Re: TODO items for removal