Re: Regression tests versus the buildfarm environment

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Regression tests versus the buildfarm environment
Date: 2010-08-11 20:47:46
Message-ID: 11596.1281559666@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Another way would be to have pg_regress honour an environment var like
> PG_REGRESS_PORT, which the buildfarm script could use.

Yeah, that would work too. (Is it portable to Windows, though?)

I prefer the change-the-default approach mainly because it wouldn't
require any documentation, whereas it'd be a bit hard to argue that
environment variables etc shouldn't be documented ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2010-08-11 20:51:13 Re: Regression tests versus the buildfarm environment
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2010-08-11 20:38:42 Re: Regression tests versus the buildfarm environment