Re: 8.2 features status

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Jim Nasby <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Subject: Re: 8.2 features status
Date: 2006-08-11 00:49:53
Message-ID: 1155257394.5206.9.camel@localhost
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 17:33 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> No, like the rest of the world, Trac has moved on from CVS ;)

There is CVSTrac (www.cvstrac.org), which actually predates Trac.

However, is there a reason to use Trac beyond the fact that it is
already setup? ISTM we only need a wiki, and don't need the other
features of Trac, such as the bug tracker.

-Neil

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-08-11 01:16:14 Re: 8.2 features status
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-08-11 00:34:58 Re: 8.2 features status