| From: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kaare Rasmussen <kaare(at)jasonic(dot)dk> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Three weeks left until feature freeze |
| Date: | 2006-07-12 13:13:05 |
| Message-ID: | 1152709985.2990.42.camel@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Ühel kenal päeval, K, 2006-07-12 kell 09:49, kirjutas Kaare Rasmussen:
> > There should be a Procedural Language section on pgfoundry for all of the
> > PLs, IMHO, and a README in contrib within core that points to it
> > (README.procedural_languages, if nothing else) ...
>
> I thought that the general consensus was that only plpgsql ought to be in
> core, the rest should be independent projects.
That would be doable if we had a stable language API.
As i understand it, we still dont. And even more - most of the changes
to API come frome the needs of those (new) languages
> It would be nice to have an easy way to retrieve and install the desired PL's
> but that's more of a packaging issue.
>
--
----------------
Hannu Krosing
Database Architect
Skype Technologies OÜ
Akadeemia tee 21 F, Tallinn, 12618, Estonia
Skype me: callto:hkrosing
Get Skype for free: http://www.skype.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2006-07-12 13:22:45 | Re: The vacuum-ignore-vacuum patch |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2006-07-12 13:09:25 | Re: Implied Functional Index use |