Re: [PATCH] add long options to pgbench (submission 1)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add long options to pgbench (submission 1)
Date: 2013-06-25 16:17:32
Message-ID: 11513.1372177052@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I would like to solicit opinions on whether this is a good idea. I
> understand that the patch author thinks it's a good idea, and I don't
> have a strong position either way. But I want to hear what other
> people think.

If it makes pgbench more consistent with psql's command line options,
it seems reasonable to me.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2013-06-25 16:21:59 Re: Hash partitioning.
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2013-06-25 16:15:28 Re: [PATCH] add long options to pgbench (submission 1)