Re: Possible better pg_ctl start/stop handling?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Possible better pg_ctl start/stop handling?
Date: 2005-07-11 19:20:09
Message-ID: 11481.1121109609@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>> Does the dev machine run more than one postmaster?

> No.

Hmm, it should be pretty impossible to see this if the machine's just
been rebooted and there are no other postmasters running. If you can
replicate it, could you send along the output of "ipcs -m -a" along
with the contents of the postmaster.pid file? Also, what's the platform
exactly?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-07-11 19:21:35 Re: Vacuum summary?
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-07-11 19:10:41 Vacuum summary?