Re: Allow linking against OpenSSL? (Was Re: Debian

From: Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com>
To: Tyler MacDonald <tyler(at)yi(dot)org>
Cc: freeradius-users(at)lists(dot)freeradius(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Douglas McNaught <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org>, lmyho <lm_yho(at)yahoo(dot)com>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, pgsql general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Allow linking against OpenSSL? (Was Re: Debian
Date: 2006-04-07 22:28:46
Message-ID: 1144448926.32269.41.camel@state.g2switchworks.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 17:24, Tyler MacDonald wrote:
> Greetings FreeRadius people,
>
> This discussion started on the postgresql's "pgsql-general" mailing
> list. The problem here is that the freeradius-postgresql package needs to
> link against libpgsql, which means that it may be indirectly linked against
> openssl. There is a conflict between OpenSSL's BSD license and the GPL which
> means that it's not legal to distribute a copy of GPL code that is linked in
> this way. It appears that several other GPL apps have added a special clause
> to their license that allows them to be linked against OpenSSL.
>
> Could this be done for freeradius/freeradius-postgresql as well?
> This could pave the way towards enhanced freeradius support in Debian,
> specifically the addition of freeradius-postgresql to Debian's mainline.
>
> For your reference, here is the start of the thread on the
> pgsql-general list that got us to this point:
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2006-04/msg00247.php

Please note that PostgreSQL is NOT GPL, but BSD. Just sayin'

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tyler MacDonald 2006-04-07 22:29:04 Re: Debian package for freeradius_postgresql module
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2006-04-07 22:27:51 Re: Debian package for freeradius_postgresql module