| From: | Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Douglas McNaught <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org>, Tyler MacDonald <tyler(at)yi(dot)org>, lmyho <lm_yho(at)yahoo(dot)com>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, pgsql general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Debian package for freeradius_postgresql module |
| Date: | 2006-04-07 22:12:21 |
| Message-ID: | 1144447941.32269.33.camel@state.g2switchworks.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 17:08, Tom Lane wrote:
> Douglas McNaught <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org> writes:
> > I don't think so. I got curious and looked at what's on my Ubuntu
> > system: Courier IMAP is GPL with an additional clause that explicitly
> > allows linking with OpenSSL; Postfix has an Apache-ish license; Exim
> > is GPL and also explicitly allows linking with OpenSSL; Cyrus IMAP is
> > BSDish; Apache is non-GPL... I can't think offhand of anything that
> > is GPL and links with OpenSSL without an explicit clause permitting
> > same.
>
> Hm. So can we lobby freeradius to tweak their license similarly?
I thought from Douglas' message, it appeared BSD packages didn't need
such a clause...
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-04-07 22:16:40 | Re: Debian package for freeradius_postgresql module |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-04-07 22:08:23 | Re: Debian package for freeradius_postgresql module |