Re: brin index vacuum versus transaction snapshots

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: brin index vacuum versus transaction snapshots
Date: 2015-07-30 21:24:48
Message-ID: 11424.1438291488@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Kevin Grittner wrote:
>> If you run `make installcheck` against a cluster with
>> default_transaction_isolation = 'repeatable read' you get one
>> failure:

> I am tempted to say that we should just disallow to run vacuum on a
> table containing a brin index in a transaction-snapshot transaction.

Huh? We don't allow vacuum inside a (user started) transaction now.
What new restriction are you proposing?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2015-07-30 21:28:50 Re: multivariate statistics / patch v7
Previous Message Arthur Silva 2015-07-30 21:23:22 Re: 64-bit XIDs again